Papers with reinforcement learning approach

8 papers
Integrating Question Rewrites in Conversational Question Answering: A Reinforcement Learning Approach (2022.acl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to improve QR performance dependencies among dialogue history dependencies are limited.
Approach: They propose a reinforcement learning approach that integrates QR and CQA tasks without corresponding labeled QR datasets.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves existing pipeline approaches in conversational question answering (QA) existing methods depend on assumption of corresponding QR datasets for every CQA dataset, resulting in poor performance.
Adaptive Reinforcement Tuning Language Models as Hard Data Generators for Sentence Representation (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods use contrastive learning (CL) to learn effective sentence representations, but require extensive human annotation.
Approach: They propose a reinforcement learning approach for fine-tuning small-parameter LLMs to generate high-quality hard contrastive data without human feedback.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art on seven semantic text similarity tasks.
Multi-Reward Reinforced Summarization with Saliency and Entailment (N18-2)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive text summarization is the task of compressing and rewriting a long document into a short summary while maintaining saliency, directed logical entailment, and non-redundancy.
Approach: They propose a novel reward function for ROUGESal and Entail to improve abstractive summarization . they use a coverage-based reward function to combine ROUGE and En Tail .
Outcome: The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art results on CNN/Daily Mail dataset and strong improvements in a test-only transfer setup on DUC-2002.
Combining Cognitive Modeling and Reinforcement Learning for Clarification in Dialogue (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: In many domains, dialogue systems need to work collaboratively with users to reconstruct meaning . this requires a system that can give targeted, effective feedback about the system’s understanding .
Approach: They propose a system that collaborates on reference tasks that distinguish arbitrarily varying color patches from similar distractors and use crowd workers to test their approach.
Outcome: The proposed system can distinguish varying color patches from distractors and elicit correct answers that the system understands.
LexicalAT: Lexical-Based Adversarial Reinforcement Training for Robust Sentiment Classification (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing text classification models are fragile and sensitive to simple perturbations.
Approach: They propose a generator-classifier adversarial training approach to improve classification models . they use a large-scale lexical knowledge base to generate attacking examples .
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms strong baselines and reduces test errors on neural networks.
Table-R1: Region-based Reinforcement Learning for Table Understanding (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Tables are a widely used data format that poses unique challenges for language models due to their structured row-column interactions.
Approach: They propose a region-based reinforcement learning approach that integrates region evidence into reasoning steps.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms baseline models on three benchmark datasets and significantly reduces the reasoning token consumption by 67.5%.
Training Language Models to Use Prolog as a Tool (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language models often produce plausible but incorrect reasoning traces that are difficult to verify.
Approach: They train language models to use Prolog as an external symbolic reasoning tool . they find an accuracy–auditability trade-off between tuning for correctness alone and using Prolog only for the final computation .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms supervised fine-tuning on a clean version of GSM8K.
Teaching LLMs Human-Like Editing of Inappropriate Argumentation via Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Comparing human-like edits to LLMs, we observe a mismatch in editing strategies.
Approach: They propose a reinforcement learning approach that teaches LLMs human-like editing to improve the appropriateness of arguments.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms baselines and the state of the art in human-like editing, with multi-round editing achieving appropriateness close to full rewriting.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations